Prep and try our C_DBADM_2601 valid and latest training questions & answers

CHALLENGE 1 - Plant Wave Configuration Evidence Alignment
During rollout preparation, plant quality test users can connect to both SAP HANA reporting systems. The newly installed wave database has its active configuration documented, but the upgraded pilot system still has one stabilization value recorded only in a local operations note. What should the administrator do before accepting the rollout comparison?

• A. Accept the comparison because both systems allow reporting connections.
• B. Continue the rollout and review the local operations note after plant users begin testing.
• C. Reconcile the pilot configuration value into the central administration record before acceptance.
• D. Remove the documented value from the wave database record so both records appear similar.

Explanation: Only visible for Prep4King members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).

CHALLENGE 1 - Recovery Review Configuration Traceability
During recovery readiness review, scheduling test users can open appointment backlog reports from both SAP HANA systems. The newly installed validation database has its active configuration documented, but the upgraded reporting system has one post-upgrade value recorded only in a maintenance handover log. What should the administrator do before accepting the readiness comparison?

• A. Accept the comparison because both systems return the required reports during review.
• B. Remove the documented value from the validation database record so both systems appear aligned.
• C. Reconcile the handover-log value into the upgraded system's current administration record.
• D. Continue the review and check the handover log only if users report inconsistent results.

Explanation: Only visible for Prep4King members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).

A digital publishing company operates SAP HANA for subscriber activity reporting. Users report that dashboards are available, but refresh times vary sharply during the morning reporting window. SAP HANA cockpit shows no service outage, while monitoring history shows a recurring peak in expensive statement activity from a reporting workload. The database team is asked to increase system capacity immediately because the reports are business-critical.
The constraint is that the administrator must identify the execution pattern before recommending a capacity or scheduling change. The business requires stable refresh times, but the system must remain available during investigation.
Which action best fits the observed performance evidence?

• A. Restart SAP HANA during the reporting window so existing expensive statements are cleared before users refresh dashboards.
• B. Review the expensive statement pattern and workload timing, then apply a targeted scheduling or workload adjustment based on validated evidence.
• C. Disable the reporting workload until the next maintenance window so all expensive statements are removed from the system.
• D. Increase capacity immediately because dashboard variability always indicates insufficient database resources.

Explanation: Only visible for Prep4King members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).

CHALLENGE 1 - Cutover Configuration Evidence Traceability
A database administrator proposes accepting the cutover comparison now and adding a note that one configuration value was documented outside the current record. Which response is most defensible?

• A. Ignore the note because monitoring notes already prove the configuration was observed.
• B. Require the current administration record to reflect the active value before comparison acceptance.
• C. Move the value review to the cloud migration workstream to avoid release delay.
• D. Accept the note because it acknowledges the difference without delaying cutover preparation.

Explanation: Only visible for Prep4King members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).

A regional cold-chain logistics company uses SAP HANA for shipment temperature analytics. The backup schedule runs successfully, and SAP HANA cockpit shows recent backup entries. During a recovery readiness review, the administrator finds that the validation environment can read the data backup file but cannot access the related catalog metadata needed to select the correct recovery sequence. The operations team suggests restoring directly from the visible data backup because the file itself is available.
The constraint is that the administrator must validate a controlled recovery process, including correct backup selection and recovery sequence evidence. The team cannot approve readiness based only on the presence of a backup file.
Which action best supports recovery readiness validation?

• A. Create a new data backup and ignore the earlier catalog metadata because a newer file is easier to identify.
• B. Restore access to the required backup catalog metadata, select the correct recovery sequence, and rerun the recovery validation.
• C. Restore directly from the visible data backup file and treat successful database opening as sufficient validation.
• D. Increase backup frequency so future recovery tests have more visible backup files to choose from.

Explanation: Only visible for Prep4King members. You can sign-up / login (it's free).