Prep and try our Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect valid and latest training questions & answers

A consulting company uses the Salesforce mobile app for its field consultants and uses Case object to track customer specific consulting done by field consultants. The company also has a large number of customer service representatives who takes calls from customers on company issued desktops and uses case object to track customer issues and grievances. The company would like to capture images of customer site captured by field consultants while they are editing the case record during customer site visit. The Director of IT wants to minimize customization and promote reuseability of code artifacts wherever possible.
What recommendations should an architect give to the company to implement the image capture requirement, while ensuring customer that the service rep can continue to use same lightning pages they were trained to use?

• A. Use Lightning Component as an override for "Edit" action on lightning experience allowing image capture feature. Detect the form factor of the device and redirect the user to the default not overridden view.
• B. Use Lightning Component as an override for "Edit" action on mobile view allowing image capture feature. No Change required for desktop users.
• C. Create a separate button "Edit in Mobile", which opens a custom lightning component that will allow field consultants to add an image. No change required for desktop users.

A custom ServiceFeedback object is used to collect partner feedback.
ServiceFeedback records should be available to all internal employees. The organization-wide default (OWD) is set to Private for external users so partners cannot see feedback from other partner users.
How should the architect give access to all internal employees?

• A. Set the OWD for Internal Users to Public Read-Only.
• B. Ensure all the internal users are above the partners in the Role Hierarchy.
• C. Create an owner based sharing rule for all Service Feedback records owned by partners.

Universal Containers has selected a small and diverse group of users to review inactive accounts. Given the Private sharing model, a public group was created and made available to this group of users. A sharing rule was created to make inactive accounts visible to the public group. However, some of these users are reporting they do not see any of the accounts that were shared with the public group.
What is the underlying issue for these users?

• A. The users are in profiles that have no access to the Account object.
• B. The page layout assigned to these users is different than the Account owner.
• C. The accounts arc owned by users higher in the Role Hierarchy.

A junior account manager owns an account and creates a new opportunity to manage a complex deal. She needs the help of the product specialist and solution engineer. Given the size of this deal, she knows the account is likely to be reassigned to a senior account manager in the near future.
What is the optimal way for the junior account manager to share the opportunity, given the private sharing model?

• A. Manual share on the account
• B. Opportunity Team
• C. Manual share on the opportunity

If a Case requires involvement from one of the Legal team, the Case owner adds one of the corporate lawyers to the Legal SME field on the case.
Since cases are private, how can we grant a lawyer access to a specific case when their assistance is needed?

• A. Use Apex Managed sharing in a case Trigger that shares the record to the user identified in the Legal SME field.
• B. Create an Criteria Based Sharing Rule that shares to the Corporate Legal Tear Role when the "legal assistance needed?" field is checked.
• C. Create a Criteria Based Sharing Rule that shares to the Legal Public Group when the "legal assistance needed?" field is checked.